Question: Which of the things outlined in these cases ought to be protected or restricted by law? and which should be left up to platforms? That is are there some aspects of speech here that the law ought to restrict, based on content or intent (harassment)? and are there some that should be up to the platforms to restrict? Should these platforms go beyond the law? or if it is legal should they allow it?
Keywords: Epistemology, “television as a medium,” “Now This” “being informed”
Question: Postman seems to not be a very big fan of TV here. In two paragraphs summarize his argument. Do this in a way if Postman were here to read it he would agree with you. That is your goal is to capture the argument not agree or disagree, just present and distill its essential points. Then in a third paragraph tell me if you agree or disagree with Postman’s analysis, why? why not?